tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post5770137833936961200..comments2023-10-31T05:14:08.945+13:00Comments on Undeniably Atheist: Creationists on VestigesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post-29267137335533945862011-07-22T02:47:23.176+12:002011-07-22T02:47:23.176+12:00If you deny evolution you are either ignorant and ...If you deny evolution you are either ignorant and wilfully disregard evidence that contraticts your beliefs. There is no shame in being wrong. I was a creatiionist because that is what I was taught. It takes courage to admit you are wrong and if you do you will feel an awesome connection to all the other creatures of the world. More on topic, this is a great post. Creationists commit a major fallacy by redifining vestiges and then attacking the redifined word. A distraction and type of a straw-man type fallacy.Bill Rabarahttp://magicalmemoriesphotography.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post-50446917242146977722010-04-19T10:33:18.538+12:002010-04-19T10:33:18.538+12:00Lol, don't approve Blair's comments :DLol, don't approve Blair's comments :DRyannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post-50438529595995289932010-04-18T23:13:27.703+12:002010-04-18T23:13:27.703+12:00ryan likes boysryan likes boysAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post-19012846801327448772010-04-16T15:33:53.353+12:002010-04-16T15:33:53.353+12:00Yes, they're completely at odds with each othe...Yes, they're completely at odds with each other on several levels.<br />First level, one says we develop/refine traits as a result of natural selection, and that these traits are improving for one reason or another. On the other hand the 'fall of man' view says that as a species we're getting worse as a species as a result of sin. Not only is this sin view un-falsifiable and therefore un-scientific it goes against everything we know about human history.<br />On the second level, there was never an 'Adam'. Humankind didn't evolve from one singular, isolated, monogamous couple, and certainly not as early as the Bible would lead one to believe.<br />On the third level, if god did randomly choose one human who he called Adam to start his chosen group of people, what about the other groups of humans at the same time? Were they not offered this revelation of god? Why is it that other cultures developed god-concepts before the Israelites did?KJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817974804323066290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7498388463767378455.post-54446804404818928162010-04-16T14:25:36.828+12:002010-04-16T14:25:36.828+12:00does the concept of the fall and evolution have to...does the concept of the fall and evolution have to be independent of each other?josh poundnoreply@blogger.com